Search found 73 matches

Go to advanced search

by lasso
Wed Oct 29, 2014 11:15 am
Forum: Information & Announcements
Topic: CITP protocol specification (Old Archive)
Replies: 5
Views: 29280

Re: CITP protocol specification

It's time for an update of the specification! Changes: - The OMEX chapter has been removed as it never took flight. - Removed all 'struct' keywords as they were misguiding. - Change of PINF/PLoc multicast address. - Added new SDMX Capapabilities, Channel List and Set External Universe Source message...
by lasso
Tue Aug 05, 2014 6:14 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: CITP/MSEX video stream resolutions
Replies: 13
Views: 21091

Re: CITP/MSEX video stream resolutions

Hi Hippy, But my point is why would anyone want something greater than SD video on their console? That's a valid point and I don't disagree. However the discussion of higher resolutions is not for consoles, but for visualizers. As for the specifics of bandwidth limitations of MA, that's for them to ...
by lasso
Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:43 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: CITP/MSEX video stream resolutions
Replies: 13
Views: 21091

Re: CITP/MSEX video stream resolutions

An update here - MA lighting suggested to me during ProLight+Sound in Frankfurt this year to send fragmented StFr messages, as a solution to two problems: ⋅ Being able to send stream frames larger than 65K ⋅ Being able to send a several smaller (than 65K) frame fragments for traf...
by lasso
Fri Jun 27, 2014 6:37 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: CITP/MSEX video stream resolutions
Replies: 13
Views: 21091

Re: CITP/MSEX video stream resolutions

PhasedMedia wrote:Has the been any changes recently that will allow for stream resolutions above 144x144px?


No, but for resolutions above 144x144px it has been possible to stream JPG data for quite some time already? As I noted in the initial post of this thread you can get up to 600x400px then.
by lasso
Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:59 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: ucs1 / ucs2
Replies: 1
Views: 4288

Re: ucs1 / ucs2

Hi, I realize the use of the keyword struct is probably what is causing the confusion here, so I will remove that from the spec. The second sentence of the first paragraph under section 2 is supposed to clarify this, but... well. Anyway, the message definitions are not to be interpreted as C structs...
by lasso
Sun Mar 09, 2014 8:45 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: Change of multicast address?
Replies: 0
Views: 35069

Change of multicast address?

Hi, It has been pointed out by MA Lighting that according to http://www.iana.org/assignments/multicast-addresses/multicast-addresses.xhtml the 224.0.0.180 multicast address used by CITP is not well chosen as this is supposed not to be forwarded to other subnets. While most routers probably don't enf...
by lasso
Fri Aug 23, 2013 8:53 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: CITP logo
Replies: 1
Views: 4857

Re: CITP logo

Hi,

No, I'm afraid there's no official logo. I also don't think anybody uses that logo in the top left corner so chances of anybody recognizing it will be very slim. I would recommend showing a symbol that represents what you're actually connected to instead - a media server, visualiser or console!
by lasso
Sun Feb 03, 2013 8:16 pm
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: CINF message and byte order of SupportedMSEXVersions ...
Replies: 1
Views: 5408

Re: CINF message and byte order of SupportedMSEXVersions ...

Hi Lao, As according to section 2.1 - Data types, all fields are little endian - not network byte order. Once in the memory of the application, the MSB carries the major version and the LSB the minor version of the support MSEX versions. So in this case, the first incoming byte is the minor version ...
by lasso
Thu Jan 17, 2013 3:19 pm
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: Testing tools for citp/msex?
Replies: 1
Views: 5527

Re: Testing tools for citp/msex?

Hi santi,

At the moment there is no complete test suite (as you have noticed), so I guess the best thing to do is download other console softwares that support CITP/MSEX?

Regards,
Lars Wernlund
by lasso
Mon Oct 29, 2012 6:52 am
Forum: Design - For developers
Topic: LSta status flags
Replies: 1
Views: 5065

Re: LSta status flags

Are these flags meant to be cumulative? For example, our media server allows for a state of looping playback. This state qualifies for two of the layer status flags (0x001 MediaPlaying and 0x004 MediaPlaybackLooping). Would the resulting flag be 0x005? Or is it intended that non-looping playback (p...

Go to advanced search

cron