MSEX 1.2 Reference Implementation

Bits and byte level questions, ideas and suggestions for the CITP protocol.
jossgray
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 3:03 pm

MSEX 1.2 Reference Implementation

Postby jossgray » Tue May 17, 2016 3:09 pm

Hi,

Firstly lewlight.com is down. Are there any mirrors for the CITP Test Suite? And which version of MSEX does it implement?

Does anybody know of any media servers which implement MSEX 1.2?

Are there any reference packet samples for MSEX 1.2?

Is the UUID field in CITP_MSEX_1.2_SInf null terminated like other ucs1 fields?

Thanks :)

Joss

User avatar
lasso
Site Admin
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: MSEX 1.2 Reference Implementation

Postby lasso » Tue May 24, 2016 7:40 am

Hi,

It's back online now (lewlight.com)! I think it does up to 1.2, but I know I should release a new version because it has flaws. I will point out that it's not an attempt at a CITP compatibility test app, the term "test suite" simply refers to being useful for testing.

The UUID field is not null terminated, a UUID in string form always requires exactly 36 bytes.
Lars Wernlund
Technical Manager, Capture Sweden

jossgray
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 3:03 pm

Re: MSEX 1.2 Reference Implementation

Postby jossgray » Tue May 24, 2016 2:10 pm

Great thanks.

I noticed on the spec, the following

Code: Select all

CITP_MSEX_1.2_GEIn
{
    CITP_MSEX_Header   CITPMSEXHeader           // CITP MSEX header. MSEX ContentType is "GEIn" and version is 1.1.


Should it not be version 1.2?

User avatar
lasso
Site Admin
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 7:44 am
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: MSEX 1.2 Reference Implementation

Postby lasso » Thu May 26, 2016 7:11 am

Hi,

You're right, that's a typo. And I found a could of more along the same line. I've commited a fix now!
Lars Wernlund
Technical Manager, Capture Sweden


Return to “Design - For developers”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron